If I understand correctly, the relationships between lanes have to be specified in the scenario file with the help of XML tag (like , , etc.)
Some scenarios are missing this information. For example DEU_Muc-2_2_T-1 doesn’t include the information that the lanes 34782 and 34784 are adjacent.
Hi, thanks for your feed back, we will look into it. For now you can just skip these scenarios : )
Hi, the same problem seems to occur with DEU_Muc-2_1_T-1.
In addition, the lanelet relations also seem to be messed up for RUS_Bicycle-3_2_T-1 and RUS_Bicycle-12_1_T-1.
Hi,
thank you for the information.
We will soon publish scenarios in the new format 2020a where the adjacencies will be valid.
Best,
Sebastian